2016 Telders uluslararası hukuk farazi dava yarışması (Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi takımının dava dilekçeleri)

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaraduman, Sena
dc.contributor.authorAnlar, Seden
dc.contributor.authorŞenoğlu, İpek
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Christina
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T20:41:35Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T20:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Hukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAlso violated the right of navigation of the yacht. The interception of msy plutarchus was unlawful because there was no reason for a lawful right of visit. Mr. Clark did not comply with his duty to rescue boats in distress as an international obligation. The 84 oenotrians searching for protection should be considered as refugees under the refugee convention. These oenotrian refugees are protected by the non-refoulment principle. The exception of the nonrefoulment principle is not applicable to the 84 oenotrians because they cannot be seen as a danger for the security or community of Ionia. Refoulment of the refugees constitutes a violation of their access to fair and effective procedure with respect to the claim of their refugee status. The right to seek and enjoy asylum of the oenotrians in the msy plutarchus was not recognized or granted by Ionia as Mr. Clark does not even consider to verify their claims. Ms. Amarigi has been subjected to the iniction of severe pain and suering by the punching and locking away in her room through Mr. Clark. Mr. Clark had the intent to commit the crime of torture for making sure that the yacht will return to esperya. Mr. Clark committed the crime of torture in order to intimidate, coerce and discriminate ms. Amarigi. Mr. Clark is the perpetrator of the crime of torture by punching ms amarigi and locking her into her room. Ms. Amarigi can be regarded as the victim of the crime of torture by being punched. Ionia does not enjoy state immunity with regards to the acts of mr. Clark, also the discplinary process and suspension is insucient. Mr. Clark does not enjoy immunity of state ocials, neither personal nor functional immunity. Esperya is entitled to exercise criminal jurisdiction over the acts of Mr. Clark in accordance with its universal jurisdiction because torture is an international crime.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaraduman, S., Anlar, S., Şenoğlu, İ. ve Schmid, C. (2016). 2016 Telders uluslararası hukuk farazi dava yarışması (Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi takımının dava dilekçeleri) / Telders internatıonal law moot court competition 2016. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 15(1), s. 111-150.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage150en_US
dc.identifier.issn1303-5630
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://jurix.com.tr/article/6101
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/1370
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryUlusal Editör Denetimli Degide Makaleen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY02670
dc.subject2016 Telders Uluslararası Hukuk Farazi Dava Yarışmasıen_US
dc.subjectDava Dilekçelerien_US
dc.subjectTelders internatıonal law moot court competitionen_US
dc.title2016 Telders uluslararası hukuk farazi dava yarışması (Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi takımının dava dilekçeleri)en_US
dc.title.alternativeTelders internatıonal law moot court competition 2016en_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Hukuk Fakültesi Koleksiyonu