Türk hukukunda aile hekimliği sistemi ve aile hekiminin işveren sıfatına ilişkin bir inceleme
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2021
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Maltepe Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Türk hukukunda 2008 yılında genel sağlık sigortası kurulmuş ve genel sağlık sigortası ile üç basamaklı sağlık sisteminin birinci basamağında aile hekimleri görevlendirilmiştir. Birinci basamak sağlık hizmetleri ve aile hekimleri, tüm sağlık sisteminin temelini oluşturduğu için sağlık sisteminin işleyişi açısından özel bir öneme sahiptir. Aile hekimliği sistemi uygulamaya konulduğu andan itibaren ilgili mevzuatta sıkça değişiklik yapılmış ve aile hekimlerinin görev alanı giderek genişletilmiştir. Aile hekimlerinin görev alanı açısından irdeleme yapıldığında İngiltere hukukundaki aile hekimliği sistemi ile önemli noktalarda benzerlik olması sebebiyle Türk hukukundaki aile hekimliği sistemi, İngiltere hukukundaki aile hekimliği sistemi ile birlikte çalışmamızın ilk bölümünde incelenmiştir. Aile hekimlerinin yükümlülükleri arasında, aile sağlığı merkezlerinde çalıştırılması gereken işçilerle iş ilişkisinin kurulması ve sürdürülmesi de yer almaktadır; ancak bu iş ilişkisi sebebiyle açılan davalarda, aile hekimlerinin işveren sıfatına sahip olup olmamasıyla ilgili Yargıtay’ın 9. ve 10. Hukuk Daireleri arasında görüş farklılığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmamızda daha sonra, uygulama açısından önem arz eden bir konu olan aile hekimlerinin işveren sıfatına ilişkin değerlendirme yapılmıştır.
In Turkish law, general health insurance was established in 2008, and family physicians were assigned to the primary tier of the three-tier health system via general health insurance. Primary healthcare services and family physicians are of special significance in terms of the functioning of the health system since they constitute the basis of the entire health system. Since the family medicine system was put into practice, changes have been made frequently in the relevant legislation, and family physicians’ area of duties has been expanded gradually. Upon reviewing family physicians’ area of duties, similarities were observed between the family medicine systems in British law and Turkish law. Therefore, the family medicine systems in Turkish law and British law were analyzed in the first section of our study. The obligations of family physicians also include the establishment and maintenance of employment relationships with the workers who should be employed in family health centers. However, in cases filed owing to this employment relationship, a difference of opinion appeared between the Civil Chambers 9 and 10 of the Supreme Court regarding whether family physicians assumed the employer capacity. In our study, an evaluation was then made on the employer capacity of family physicians, which is a significant matter in respect of practice.
In Turkish law, general health insurance was established in 2008, and family physicians were assigned to the primary tier of the three-tier health system via general health insurance. Primary healthcare services and family physicians are of special significance in terms of the functioning of the health system since they constitute the basis of the entire health system. Since the family medicine system was put into practice, changes have been made frequently in the relevant legislation, and family physicians’ area of duties has been expanded gradually. Upon reviewing family physicians’ area of duties, similarities were observed between the family medicine systems in British law and Turkish law. Therefore, the family medicine systems in Turkish law and British law were analyzed in the first section of our study. The obligations of family physicians also include the establishment and maintenance of employment relationships with the workers who should be employed in family health centers. However, in cases filed owing to this employment relationship, a difference of opinion appeared between the Civil Chambers 9 and 10 of the Supreme Court regarding whether family physicians assumed the employer capacity. In our study, an evaluation was then made on the employer capacity of family physicians, which is a significant matter in respect of practice.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Aile Hekimi, Aile Sağlığı Merkezi, Aile Sağlığı Çalışanı, Hukuki Statü, İşveren, Family Physician, Family Health Center, Family Health Worker, Legal Status, Employer
Kaynak
Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
1
Sayı
2
Künye
Taşdemir, Y. (2021). Türk hukukunda aile hekimliği sistemi ve aile hekiminin işveren sıfatına ilişkin bir inceleme / The family physician system in turkish law and a review of the employer capacity of family physicians. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Maltepe Üniversitesi. 1(2), s. 261-296.
