Yazar "Anlar, Seden" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Yayın
    2015 Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi (ICC) kurgusal dava yarışması (Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi takımı dava dilekçeleri)
    (Maltepe Üniversitesi, 2014) Anlar, Seden; Karaduman, Sena; Timur, Damla; Ersoy, Batuhan
    This is a fictional case intended to enable students to familiarize themselves with the law and practice of the ICC. Participating teams will be divided into three groups: (1) Counsel for the Government of Braanos, (2) Counsel for the Prosecution, and (3) Legal Representative for Victims (hereinafter "Victims' Representative"). In accordance with the rules of the competition, each team shall write a Memorial for each of these groups, setting forth its legal arguments in the context of the interlocutory appeal by the State of Braanos challenging the jurisdiction of the ICC and the designation of a single Victims' Representative.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Yayın
    2016 Telders uluslararası hukuk farazi dava yarışması (Maltepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi takımının dava dilekçeleri)
    (Maltepe Üniversitesi, 2016) Karaduman, Sena; Anlar, Seden; Şenoğlu, İpek; Schmid, Christina
    Also violated the right of navigation of the yacht. The interception of msy plutarchus was unlawful because there was no reason for a lawful right of visit. Mr. Clark did not comply with his duty to rescue boats in distress as an international obligation. The 84 oenotrians searching for protection should be considered as refugees under the refugee convention. These oenotrian refugees are protected by the non-refoulment principle. The exception of the nonrefoulment principle is not applicable to the 84 oenotrians because they cannot be seen as a danger for the security or community of Ionia. Refoulment of the refugees constitutes a violation of their access to fair and effective procedure with respect to the claim of their refugee status. The right to seek and enjoy asylum of the oenotrians in the msy plutarchus was not recognized or granted by Ionia as Mr. Clark does not even consider to verify their claims. Ms. Amarigi has been subjected to the iniction of severe pain and suering by the punching and locking away in her room through Mr. Clark. Mr. Clark had the intent to commit the crime of torture for making sure that the yacht will return to esperya. Mr. Clark committed the crime of torture in order to intimidate, coerce and discriminate ms. Amarigi. Mr. Clark is the perpetrator of the crime of torture by punching ms amarigi and locking her into her room. Ms. Amarigi can be regarded as the victim of the crime of torture by being punched. Ionia does not enjoy state immunity with regards to the acts of mr. Clark, also the discplinary process and suspension is insucient. Mr. Clark does not enjoy immunity of state ocials, neither personal nor functional immunity. Esperya is entitled to exercise criminal jurisdiction over the acts of Mr. Clark in accordance with its universal jurisdiction because torture is an international crime.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Yayın
    The law heritage of the sea and common of mankind
    (Maltepe Üniversitesi, 2014) Anlar, Seden; Tüzün, Berk; İriparlak, Meltem
    ln the late 19th century, poly metallic nodules were discovered on the deep seabed. The amount of nodules was found enough to start commercial mining activities, Thanks to the developments in technology, new mineral resources were accessible. However, the possibility to access these mineral resources raised the question of jurisdiction of any state over the deep seabed. Therefore, a legal regime called "common heritage of mankind" was adopted to regulate jurisdiction over these resources. lt is a fact that common heritage of mankind principle has been interpreted in many difterent ways by States. Since there has been no juridical consideration of the common heritage of mankind principle to clarify these interpretations...