Use of distally based saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous cross-leg flaps in limb salvage

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8142-8794en_US
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorAkan, Mithat
dc.contributor.authorGideroğlu, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorAköz, Tayfun
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:01:46Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:01:46Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractNeurocutaneous island flaps have been very popular in soft-tissue coverage of the lower extremities. These flaps are based on the arterial network around the superficial sensory nerves. The advantages of these flaps are easy and quick dissection (hence a time-saving operation), acceptable donor site morbidity, and preservation of major arteries of the leg. The authors used five neurofasciocutaneous and three musculofasciocutaneous flaps successfully as cross-leg flaps for the coverage of relatively large defects of the lower two thirds of the leg and foot in 8 patients. They conclude that reverse saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous flaps as a cross-leg flap in patients who cannot be reconstructed with other flap alternatives have many advantages over traditionNeurocutaneous island flaps have been very popular in soft-tissue coverage of the lower extremities. These flaps are based on the arterial network around the superficial sensory nerves. The advantages of these flaps are easy and quick dissection (hence a time-saving operation), acceptable donor site morbidity, and preservation of major arteries of the leg. The authors used five neurofasciocutaneous and three musculofasciocutaneous flaps successfully as cross-leg flaps for the coverage of relatively large defects of the lower two thirds of the leg and foot in 8 patients. They conclude that reverse saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous flaps as a cross-leg flap in patients who cannot be reconstructed with other flap alternatives have many advantages over traditional cross-leg procedures, such as short vascularization time, minimal patient discomfort, wide arc of rotation and great versatility, and a safe vascular pattern. vNeurocutaneous island flaps have been very popular in soft-tissue coverage of the lower extremities. These flaps are based on the arterial network around the superficial sensory nerves. The advantages of these flaps are easy and quick dissection (hence a time-saving operation), acceptable donor site morbidity, and preservation of major arteries of the leg. The authors used five neurofasciocutaneous and three musculofasciocutaneous flaps successfully as cross-leg flaps for the coverage of relatively large defects of the lower two thirds of the leg and foot in 8 patients. They conclude that reverse saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous flaps as a cross-leg flap in patients who cannot be reconstructed with other flap alternatives have many advantages over traditional cross-leg procedures, such as short vascularization time, minimal patient discomfort, wide arc of rotation and great versatility, and a safe vascular pattern. Neurocutaneous island flaps have been very popular in soft-tissue coverage of the lower extremities. These flaps are based on the arterial network around the superficial sensory nerves. The advantages of these flaps are easy and quick dissection (hence a time-saving operation), acceptable donor site morbidity, and preservation of major arteries of the leg. The authors used five neurofasciocutaneous and three musculofasciocutaneous flaps successfully as cross-leg flaps for the coverage of relatively large defects of the lower two thirds of the leg and foot in 8 patients. They conclude that reverse saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous flaps as a cross-leg flap in patients who cannot be reconstructed with other flap alternatives have many advantages over traditional cross-leg procedures, such as short vascularization time, minimal patient discomfort, wide arc of rotation and great versatility, and a safe vascular pattern. al cross-leg procedures, such as short vascularization time, minimal patient discomfort, wide arc of rotation and great versatility, and a safe vascular pattern.en_US
dc.identifier.citationYıldırım, S., Akan, M., Gideroğlu, K. ve Aköz, T. (2001). Use of distally based saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous cross-leg flaps in limb salvage. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 47(5), s. 568-574.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage574en_US
dc.identifier.issn1536-3708
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage568en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/3532
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Plastic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryUluslararası Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.snmzKY00275
dc.titleUse of distally based saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous cross-leg flaps in limb salvageen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu