Seismic risk prioritization of masonry buildings using the first-level approacnes for vulnerability assessment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSanri-Karapinar, I.
dc.contributor.authorOzsoy-Ozbay, A.E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:40:42Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:40:42Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.descriptionInternational Conference on Technology, Engineering and Science, IConTES 2022 -- 16 November 2022 through 19 November 2022 -- -- 288709en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to determine the seismic risk distribution of old masonry buildings located in Galata, the historical region of istanbul. In order to obtain seismic risk prioritization of the built environment, the seismic vulnerability assessment of 40 old masonry buildings was carried out according to both the Vulnerability Index Method (VIM) based on the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) and the procedure in the Specifications for Determination of Seismically Vulnerable Buildings (SDSVB 2019). In the first part of the study, using the building data gathered by the screening process on site, the vulnerability scores (VS) comprising the structural and non-structural parameters were obtained and the performance score (PS) of each building was calculated according to SDSVB 2019. Depending on the results, in order to determine the seismic priority levels, the buildings were ranked from the lowest to the highest performance score and classified in terms of their structural vulnerability. Then, in the second part of the study, the vulnerability index (VI) for each building was determined depending on the building parameters affecting the structural vulnerabilities. On the basis of vulnerability indexes, damage grades of the buildings were estimated, and accordingly, the damage distribution was acquired for the building stock. Additionally, the seismic risk distribution maps were compiled for the building inventory according to the findings achieved from both methodologies. As a result of this study, the differences between the two first-level procedures were outlined with a comparative assessment, thereby demonstrating the importance of seismic risk prioritization of the historic built environment for city-scale risk management strategies. © 2022 Published by ISRES Publishing.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55549/epstem.1226258
dc.identifier.endpage282en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9.78606E+12
dc.identifier.issn2602-3199
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146606268en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1226258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/7453
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherISRES Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEurasia Proceedings of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY08797
dc.subjectDamage Distributionen_US
dc.subjectMasonry Buildingsen_US
dc.subjectSeismic Prioritizationen_US
dc.subjectSeismic Vulnerability Assessmenten_US
dc.titleSeismic risk prioritization of masonry buildings using the first-level approacnes for vulnerability assessmenten_US
dc.typeConference Object
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu