Sacrocervicopexy and combined operations involving cases of total uterine prolapse. Case reports

dc.authorid0000-0002-3166-9052en_US
dc.contributor.authorKarateke, Ateş
dc.contributor.authorGürbüz, A.
dc.contributor.authorKir, Gözde
dc.contributor.authorHaliloğlu, Berna
dc.contributor.authorKabaca, Canan
dc.contributor.authorMengüllüoğlu, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:10:10Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the outcome of sacrocervicopexy and combined operations in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in women with desire to preserving both uterus and fertility. Clinical Presentation and Intervention: Sacrocervicopexy with Prolene mesh and combined operations were performed in 3 women with total uterine prolapse because of the patient’s desire to retain fertility in 2 cases and refusal of hysterectomy in the 3rd patient. The 1st case was a 38-year-old woman, gravida 2, parity 1; the 2nd case a 42-year-old woman, gravida 3, parity 2, and the 3rd a 39-year-old woman, gravida 1, parity 1. Douglas pouch was obliterated with Moschcowitz operation. All of the women underwent sacrocervicopexy with Prolene mesh. The repair of a paravaginal defect and prophylactic Burch urethropexy were accomplished through entering Retzius’ space. Genital hiatus was narrowed via approximating levator muscles transvaginally. No serious intraoperative complications occurred and no recurrence was detected during the follow-up period. There was no postoperative complication except for some degree of pain in the 1st postoperative month in 1 case. Conclusion: The results indicate that sacrocervicopexy and repair of all concomitant defects in the pelvic floor are effective procedures in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in cases where there is a desire to retain fertility and uterus.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKarateke, A., Gürbüz, A., Kabaca, C. ve Mengüllüoğlu, M. Sacrocervicopexy and combined operations involving cases of total uterine prolapse. Case reports. Medical Principles and Practice. 13(3), s. 164-168.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage168en_US
dc.identifier.issn1423-0151
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage164en_US
dc.identifier.urikarger.com/Article/Abstract/76957
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/4197
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.institutionauthorHaliloğlu, Berna
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Principles and Practiceen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1159/000076957en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryUluslararası Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.snmzKY02896
dc.titleSacrocervicopexy and combined operations involving cases of total uterine prolapse. Case reportsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar