Effectiveness of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) Treatment of Kidney Stones Larger than Two Centimeter

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCakiroğlu, Basri/0000-0001-5337-5226en_US
dc.authoridBALCI, MUSTAFA BAHADIR CAN/0000-0003-0395-1154;en_US
dc.contributor.authorÇakıroğlu, Basri
dc.contributor.authorHazar, A. Ismet
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Mustafa Bahadir Can
dc.contributor.authorSinanoğlu, Orhun
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Arif
dc.contributor.authorNuhoğlu, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:37:27Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:37:27Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of SWL in the treatment of renal stones over 2 cm retrospectively. Methods: One hundred and nine patients (80 men and 29 women), who had been treated with ESWL because of 2cm or greater renal stones between January 2007 and January 2011, were enrolled to the study. Participants with a renal stone sized between 2 and 2.5 cm were grouped as group 1 and the others with a renal stone over 2.5 cm were grouped as group 2. We comapared the quantity of shock wave, analgesia requirement, efficacy and side effects between groups. A new generation ESWL device, Storz Medical Modulith SLK, was used for treatment. Data of the patients was analysed retrospectively. ESWL was considered successful if residual stone pieces smaller than 3 mm were detected in a 3 months period. Results: Renal stones were cleaned successfully in 100 (91.7%) patients who had been followed up for three months. There was no significant difference between group 1 and 2 in terms of residual stones. A patient required additional treatment (1.69%) in group 1, while 4 patients (8%) required additional treatment in group 2. Development rate of stone street in group 1 and 2 was 3.38% (2 patients) and 10% (5 patients), respectively. Five patients in both 2 groups required flexible uroterorenoscopy due to residual stones. Analgesic requirement rates were similar in both groups. 82 (75.2%) patients had not required anlgesic, but 27 participants had been administered intramuscular diclofenac or Tradamol. Neither general, spinal or epidural anestesia nor sedation and narcotic analgesia was administered. Haematuria rates in group 1 and 2 were 15.2% and 36%, respectively. There was also no significant difference between groups in terms of skin rash rates. Conclusion: New generation electromagnetic ESWL provides effective and reliable treatment with minimal complications in patients with renal stones over 2 cm.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/jarem.2012.19
dc.identifier.endpage81en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-6505
dc.identifier.issn2147-1894
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage77en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/jarem.2012.19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/6783
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000219580000009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Academic Research in Medicine-Jaremen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY04125
dc.subjectKidney Stonesen_US
dc.subjectSwlen_US
dc.subjectResidual Stoneen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) Treatment of Kidney Stones Larger than Two Centimeteren_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu