Comparison of two minimal invasive techniques of splenectomy: Standard laparoscopy versus transumbilical multiport single-site laparoscopy with conventional instruments

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8693-9358en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-2946-9569en_US
dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, Baris
dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, Onur
dc.contributor.authorOzemir, Ibrahim Ali
dc.contributor.authorKizilkilic, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Erman
dc.contributor.authorYigitbasi, Rafet
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:51:01Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:51:01Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.departmentMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) splenectomy which is performed on small number of patients, has been introduced with better cosmetic outcome, less postoperative pain, greater patient satisfaction and faster recovery compared to standard laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty six patients were included in the study comparing standard laparoscopic splenectomy (LS, 17 patients) transumbilical multiport splenectomy performed with conventional laparoscopic instruments (TUMP-LS, 19 patients). Two groups of patients were compared retrospectively by means of operation time, intra-and postoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, packed red cell and platelet requirements, lenght of hospitalization, pain scores and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There was no mortality in any of the groups, and no significant differences determined in operative time (P = 0,069), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0,641), patient satisfaction (P = 0,506), pain scores (P = 0,173) and the average length of hospital stay (P = 0,257). Umbilical incisions healed uneventfully and no hernia formation or wound infection was observed during follow-up period (2-34 months). There were no conversions to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Transumbilical multiport splenectomy performed with the conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and could be a logical alternative to classical laparoscopic splenectomy by combining the advantages of single access techniques and standard laparoscopy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/0972-9941.137756
dc.identifier.endpage148en_US
dc.identifier.issn0972-9941
dc.identifier.issn1998-3921
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25883456en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84925985172en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.137756
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/8231
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000352103200007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY01982
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectsingle incisionen_US
dc.subjectspleenen_US
dc.subjectsplenectomyen_US
dc.titleComparison of two minimal invasive techniques of splenectomy: Standard laparoscopy versus transumbilical multiport single-site laparoscopy with conventional instrumentsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu