Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks

dc.authoridEl-Boghdadly, Kariem/0000-0002-9912-717Xen_US
dc.authoridMcLeod, Graeme/0000-0001-5931-1362en_US
dc.authoridUppal, Vishal/0000-0001-7263-2072en_US
dc.authoridKwofie, M. Kwesi/0000-0002-0509-4064en_US
dc.authoridCoppens, Steve/0000-0002-6026-7757en_US
dc.authoridSaporito, Andrea/0000-0002-6712-2163en_US
dc.authoridPawa, Amit/0000-0002-2404-9162en_US
dc.contributor.authorEl-Boghdadly, Kariem
dc.contributor.authorWolmarans, Morne
dc.contributor.authorStengel, Angela D.
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Eric
dc.contributor.authorChin, Ki Jinn
dc.contributor.authorElsharkawy, Hesham
dc.contributor.authorKopp, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:37:30Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:37:30Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground There is heterogeneity in the names and anatomical descriptions of regional anesthetic techniques. This may have adverse consequences on education, research, and implementation into clinical practice. We aimed to produce standardized nomenclature for abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall regional anesthetic techniques. Methods We conducted an international consensus study involving experts using a three-round Delphi method to produce a list of names and corresponding descriptions of anatomical targets. After long-list formulation by a Steering Committee, the first and second rounds involved anonymous electronic voting and commenting, with the third round involving a virtual round table discussion aiming to achieve consensus on items that had yet to achieve it. Novel names were presented where required for anatomical clarity and harmonization. Strong consensus was defined as >= 75% agreement and weak consensus as 50% to 74% agreement. Results Sixty expert Collaborators participated in this study. After three rounds and clarification, harmonization, and introduction of novel nomenclature, strong consensus was achieved for the names of 16 block names and weak consensus for four names. For anatomical descriptions, strong consensus was achieved for 19 blocks and weak consensus was achieved for one approach. Several areas requiring further research were identified. Conclusions Harmonization and standardization of nomenclature may improve education, research, and ultimately patient care. We present the first international consensus on nomenclature and anatomical descriptions of blocks of the abdominal wall, chest wall, and paraspinal blocks. We recommend using the consensus results in academic and clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/rapm-2020-102451
dc.identifier.endpage580en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-7339
dc.identifier.issn1532-8651
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34145070en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108456542en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage571en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-102451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/6824
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000667720800004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBmj Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRegional Anesthesia And Pain Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY04166
dc.subjectRegional Anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectLocalen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectPostoperativeen_US
dc.subjectAcute Painen_US
dc.titleStandardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocksen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar