Can the study of Heuristics be adopted in ethics?
| dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8004-4916 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-12T20:45:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-12T20:45:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | en_US |
| dc.department | Fakülteler, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction The study of heuristics is a theory which argues that there are some practical guidelines, determined through the combination of mental and environmental conditions, that lead us to action. It analyzes how people make decisions and judgments in complex conditions with time and information constraints considering the interplay between mind and environment. In 1974, Tversky and Kahneman argued that there is a limited number of heuristic principles which are used to assess probabilities and predict values in a simpler way. Heuristics reduce the complex tasks to simpler judgmental operations (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974: 1124). Thus, they are used to simplify the decision-making process. The study of heuristics has recently started to be discussed in ethics. Gigerenzer has argued that heuristics helps us to understand the nature of moral behavior and to modify it. He investigates the nature of human rationality and its effects on moral behavior in Rationality for Mortals (2001). Rationality, for him, is about choosing the required means to attain determined ends and heuristics function as the means which helps us to arrive those ends. Heuristics are combined in an adaptive toolbox. “The function of the adaptive toolbox is, thus, to provide strategies – cognitive, emotional, and social – that help to handle a multitude of goals by making decisions quickly, frugally, accurately, or, if possible, not at all” (Gigerenzer, 2001: 43). When we find ourselves in complex situations, we go to the adaptive toolbox and adopt the proper heuristics. According... | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | “Can the Study of Heuristics be Adopted in Ethics?”, Philosophical Problems in the Contemporary World, Edt. Arlı Çil, Dilek; Boyacı, Nihal Petek, Peter Lang, 2019, ISBN:978-3-631-78129-6. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3726/b15426 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-631-78552-2 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85113235225 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631785522/html/ch10.xhtml | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.prg/10.3726/b15426 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/1751 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.institutionauthor | Arlı Çil, Dilek | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Peter Lang | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophical Problems in the Contemporary World | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Uluslararası Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
| dc.snmz | KY03233 | |
| dc.title | Can the study of Heuristics be adopted in ethics? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
