YouTube as an informational source for brachial plexus blocks: evaluation of content and educational value

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1996-7505en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4503-9462en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1219-6368en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7776-109Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3211-4945en_US
dc.contributor.authorSelvi, Onur
dc.contributor.authorTulgar, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorTopcu, Deniz, I
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Zeliha
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:53:13Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.departmentMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: YouTube, the most popular video-sharing website, contains a significant number of medical videos including brachial plexus nerve blocks. Despite the widespread use of this platform as a medical information source, there is no regulation for the quality or content of the videos. The goals of this study are to evaluate the content of material on You Tube relevant to performance of brachial plexus nerve blocks and its quality as a visual digital information source. Methods: The YouTube search was performed using keywords associated with brachial plexus nerve blocks and the final 86 videos out of 374 were included in the watch list. The assessors scored the videos separately according to the Questionnaires. Questionnaire-1 (Q1) was prepared according to the ASRA guidelines/Miller's Anesthesia as a reference text book, and Questionnaire-2 (Q2) was formulated using a modification of the criteria in Evaluation of Video Media Guidelines. Results: 72 ultrasound-guided and 14 nerve-stimulator guided block videos were evaluated. In Q1, for ultrasound-guided videos, the least scores were for Q1-5 (1.38) regarding the complications, and the greatest scores were for Q1-13 (3.30) regarding the sono-anatomic image. In videos with nerve stimulator, the lowest and the highest scores were given for Q1-7 (1.64) regarding the equipment and Q1-12 (3.60) regarding the explanation of muscle twitches respectively. In Q2, 65.3% of ultrasound-guided and 42.8% of blocks with nerve-stimulator had worse than satisfactory scores. Conclusions: The majority of the videos examined for this study lack the comprehensive approach necessary to safely guide someone seeking information about brachial plexus nerve blocks. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjan.2018.11.004
dc.identifier.endpage176en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-7094
dc.identifier.issn1806-907X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30635118en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059579621en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage168en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2018.11.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/8464
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000462627700008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isopten_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofREVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY03354
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectBrachial plexus blocksen_US
dc.titleYouTube as an informational source for brachial plexus blocks: evaluation of content and educational valueen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu