Comparison of transurethral incision of the prostate and silodosin in patients having benign prostatic obstruction in terms of retrograde ejaculation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-5337-5226en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5430-6561en_US
dc.contributor.authorCakiroglu, Basri
dc.contributor.authorHazar, Aydin Ismet
dc.contributor.authorSinanoglu, Orhun
dc.contributor.authorArda, Ersan
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Sinan
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:45:06Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:45:06Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.departmentMaltepe Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: To compare the functional outcomes and retrograde ejaculation (RE) after transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) or silodosin in bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to a small prostate. Methods: Prospectively collected data from December 2011 through December 2014 of 192 LUTS patients having fertility concerns with prostate volume smaller than 40 ml receiving either TUIP or silodosin treatment were prospectively reviewed. The treatment outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: TUIP was performed in 96 cases and silodosin 8 mg was prescribed in 96 cases. At 12th months after TUIP or continuous silodosin treatment, the decrease in mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) and the improvement of mean maximal flow rate (Q(max)) were significant (p = 0.000). The improvement in IPPS and Qmax was significantly higher in TUIP group compared to silodosin group (p = 0.005, p = 0.000) with a lower rate of retrograde ejaculation (RE) in TUIP group. (11/96 vs 33/96) (p = 0.000) Conclusions: Both TUIP and silodosin ensures comparable improvement in PVR, IPSS and Q(max) with a lower rate of RE on the TUIP group in prostates weighing less than 40 grams suggesting that TUIP is a better choice in younger patiens seeking preservation of ejaculation with fertility concerns.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/aiua.2017.1.31
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.identifier.issn1124-3562
dc.identifier.issn2282-4197
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28403592en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019198144en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage31en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2017.1.31
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/7796
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000406053700007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPAGEPRESS PUBLen_US
dc.relation.ispartofARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY00323
dc.subjectProstateen_US
dc.subjectRetrograde ejaculationen_US
dc.subjectSilodosinen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral incision prostateen_US
dc.titleComparison of transurethral incision of the prostate and silodosin in patients having benign prostatic obstruction in terms of retrograde ejaculationen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu