Effects of robotic rehabilitation on recovery of hand functions in acute stroke: a preliminary randomized controlled study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1259-980Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorCoşkunsu, Dilber Karagözoğlu
dc.contributor.authorAkçay, Sümeyye
dc.contributor.authorOğul, Özden Erkan
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Kübra
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Necla
dc.contributor.authorZileli, Füsun
dc.contributor.authorTüzün, Birgül Baştan
dc.contributor.authorKrespi, Yakup
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:01:14Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:01:14Z
dc.date.issued20222en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of EMG-driven robotic rehabilitation on hand motor functions and daily living activities of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Materials & Method: A preliminary randomized-controlled, single-blind trial rectuited twenty-four patients with acute ischemic stroke (<1 month after cerebrovascular accident) and randomly allocated to experimental group (EG) and control group (CG). Neurophysiological rehabilitation program was performed to both EG and CG for 5?days a week and totally 15 sessions. The EG also received robotic rehabilitation with the EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robot (Hand of Hope®, Rehab-Robotics Company) 15 sessions over 3?weeks. Hand motor functions (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)), activities of daily living (Motor Activity Log (MAL)), force and EMG activities of extensor and flexor muscles for the cup test were evaluated before treatment (pretreatment) and after the 15th session (posttreatment). Results: Eleven patients (59.91?±?14.20?yr) in the EG and 9 patients (70?±?14.06?yr) in the CG completed the study. EG did not provide a significant advantage compared with the CG in FMA-UE, ARAT and MAL scores and cup-force and EMG activities (p>?.05 for all). Conclusion: In this preliminary study, improvement in motor functions, daily living activities and force were found in both groups. However, addition of the EMG-driven robotic treatment to the neurophysiological rehabilitation program did not provide an additional benefit to the clinical outcomes in 3?weeks in acute stroke patients.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCoşkunsu, D.K., Akçay, S., Öztürk, N. and at all. (2022). Effects of robotic rehabilitation on recovery of hand functions in acute stroke: a preliminary randomized controlled study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 146(5), p.499-511.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ane.13672
dc.identifier.endpage511en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35855628en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134375101en_US
dc.identifier.startpage499en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.prg/10.1111/ane.13672
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/3474
dc.identifier.volume146en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000827677400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorÖztürk, Necla
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherActa Neurologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Neurologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryUluslararası Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY00049
dc.subjectHanden_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectRoboticsen_US
dc.subjectStroke acuteen_US
dc.titleEffects of robotic rehabilitation on recovery of hand functions in acute stroke: a preliminary randomized controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu