A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-7749-2814en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2107-4370en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5902-8831en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7775-9053en_US
dc.contributor.authorErdoğan, Hakika
dc.contributor.authorAkıngöl, Ziya
dc.contributor.authorCam, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorŞencan, Sadık
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T21:03:03Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T21:03:03Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose The aim of the study was to statistically compare intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured using noncontact tonometer (NCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) with fluorescein (fGAT), and GAT without fluorescein (nGAT). The study was also performed to test whether the values obtained using each technique change in accordance with the central corneal thickness (CCT) and refractive and keratometric values. Study design This study was a prospective study of 188 eyes of 94 healthy volunteers. Methods: IOP was measured using fGAT, nGAT and NCT. CCT, refractive values, and keratometric values were measured, and the correlations and differences in the IOP for each tonometer were investigated. Results The mean IOP values obtained with the NCT, nGAT, and fGAT were 17.5±3.7, 12.3±2.7, and 12.5±2 mmHg. The mean CCT was 538.2±34.4 µm, the mean refractive value was 0.9±1.2 D, and the mean keratometric value was 43.5±1.5 D. NCT was positively correlated with fGAT and GAT values and was significantly higher than both the values. There were no differences between fGAT and GAT values. No correlation was observed between the CCT and keratometric and refractive values and the difference between NCT and nGAT or fGAT. Conclusion Differences in the measurements obtained using nGAT and fGAT were insignificant (P>0.05). Both values were positively correlated with NCT measurements (r =0.354, P<0.05) and were independent of CCT, keratometry, and refraction values. nGAT appears to be suitable for use in routine clinic practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHakika, E., Akıngöl, Z., Cam, Ö. ve Şencan, S. (2018). A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein. Clinical Ophthalmology, National Library of Medicine. 12, s. 2183-2188.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S177870
dc.identifier.endpage2188en_US
dc.identifier.issn1177-5483
dc.identifier.pmid30464378en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057712664en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2183en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6211304/
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.prg/10.2147/OPTH.S177870
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12415/3623
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000448608900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorHakika, Erdoğan
dc.institutionauthorAkıngöl, Ziya
dc.institutionauthorCam, Özlem
dc.institutionauthorŞencan, Sadık
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Library of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryUluslararası Hakemli Dergide Makale - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKY00538
dc.subjectfluoresceinen_US
dc.subjectintraocular pressureen_US
dc.subjectGoldmann applanation tonometryen_US
dc.subjectnoncontact tonometryen_US
dc.subjectcentral corneal thicknessen_US
dc.subjectrefractive valueen_US
dc.titleA comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluoresceinen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu